[anti-abuse-wg] abuse-c cleanup

Hi Gilles

I have just submit a proposal to the DB WG on the cleanup process. There 
was some discussion a long time ago on converting IRT object into ROLE 
objects, but that discussion was never brought to any conclusion. I 
don't propose to include that in this cleanup.

cheers
Denis Walker
Independent Netizen


On 07/05/2015 19:06, Gilles Massen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 5/5/2015 15:59 , denis walker wrote:
>
>> The first two steps are done, but the last one seems to have been
>> overlooked. The idea of "abuse-c:" was to create one single place/way of
>> documenting abuse contact details. So far all that has been achieved is
>> to add a fourth way to document it. All the old ways ("abuse-mailbox:"
>> in 5 object types, IRT and remarks) are still littered throughout the
>> database.
>>
>> I think it is time to schedule that cleanup.
> I'd like to have the "cleanup" defined and discussed before doing it.
> The 'remarks' are obviously not really useful, and the abuse-c seems to
> replace functionally the abuse-mailbox (except that I still miss a 'more
> specific' abuse-c). The IRT objects are different though, and have
> features that the abuse-c lacks. So unless the abuse-c is able to
> replace the IRT, I'd object to deleting those.
>
> (to be specific: I'd hate to lose the signature and encryption fields -
> I think it was a mistake not to add those to the abuse-c from the start)
>
> best,
> Gilles
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20150507/b4da3899/attachment.html>