<html> <head> <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> <tt>Hi Gilles I have just submit a proposal to the DB WG on the cleanup process. There was some discussion a long time ago on converting IRT object into ROLE objects, but that discussion was never brought to any conclusion. I don't propose to include that in this cleanup. cheers Denis Walker Independent Netizen </tt> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 07/05/2015 19:06, Gilles Massen wrote: </div> <blockquote cite="mid:554B9B9C.7060101@restena.lu" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Hi, On 5/5/2015 15:59 , denis walker wrote: </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">The first two steps are done, but the last one seems to have been overlooked. The idea of "abuse-c:" was to create one single place/way of documenting abuse contact details. So far all that has been achieved is to add a fourth way to document it. All the old ways ("abuse-mailbox:" in 5 object types, IRT and remarks) are still littered throughout the database. I think it is time to schedule that cleanup. </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""> I'd like to have the "cleanup" defined and discussed before doing it. The 'remarks' are obviously not really useful, and the abuse-c seems to replace functionally the abuse-mailbox (except that I still miss a 'more specific' abuse-c). The IRT objects are different though, and have features that the abuse-c lacks. So unless the abuse-c is able to replace the IRT, I'd object to deleting those. (to be specific: I'd hate to lose the signature and encryption fields - I think it was a mistake not to add those to the abuse-c from the start) best, Gilles </pre> </blockquote> </body> </html>