This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Finder is not checking admin-c from org object?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Finder is not checking admin-c from org object?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Finder is not checking admin-c from org object?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Piotr Strzyzewski
Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
Thu Feb 13 14:12:22 CET 2014
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 04:58:42PM +0400, Levon Avagyan wrote: Dear Levon > Thanks for reply! > > You are absolutely right! I was using first resource to verify my changes. > So as I understood my current DB information is OK from RIPE's point of view > and the tool is not processing it correctly. > And from the rest of Your message I understood that it wise to duplicate abuse > contact in org: object as abuse-mailbox: attribute until everything will > settle down right? I think that this will be helpful to you: https://www.ripe.net/lir-services/resource-management/faqs-for-abuse-c Although I personally put abuse-mailbox in both ORGANISATION and ROLE objects, the only one which is necessary is the one from the ROLE object referenced from the ORGANISATION referenced from the resource. Best regards, Piotr -- gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Finder is not checking admin-c from org object?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Finder is not checking admin-c from org object?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]