[anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Regulations

Sascha Luck wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 09:47:35AM +0200, Frank Gadegast wrote:
>> What about a RIR regulation to ensure that address space is only
>> used for purposes not harming anybody ?
>> That resource holders are responsible for the abuse coming
>> out of their networks ?
>
> Srsly? Abandon the common-carrier principle for the sake of a minor
> annoyance like *spam*? Forcing ISPs to censor and surveil all traffic

Sure, its a matter we should discuss, how far we like
to push things.

For a start I would like to force resource holders to actually
read the mail arriving under their abuse address.
This will not force anybody to control all the traffic.

F.e. by returning ticket numbers or the like.
Or sending automatic CCs to the RIPE NCC ..
This could be controlled, weighted and analyzed by the NCC
and could give evidence about how the ISP is working
with abuse reports.

And this could be used in the autiting process somebody
(sorry, forgot the name) likes to bring a bit further
right now here on this list.

Others have probably other ideas, lets hear and discuss them.

> passing their networks? Apart from the fact that this is undemocratic
> and unworkable, how well did that work for China?

We are talking about the RIPE region.


Kind regards, Frank
>
> rgds,
> Sascha Luck
>
>