This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Regulations
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Regulations
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Regulations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Fri Jun 28 09:55:41 CEST 2013
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 09:47:35AM +0200, Frank Gadegast wrote: >What about a RIR regulation to ensure that address space is only >used for purposes not harming anybody ? >That resource holders are responsible for the abuse coming >out of their networks ? Srsly? Abandon the common-carrier principle for the sake of a minor annoyance like *spam*? Forcing ISPs to censor and surveil all traffic passing their networks? Apart from the fact that this is undemocratic and unworkable, how well did that work for China? rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Regulations
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Regulations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]