[anti-abuse-wg] Bye Bye

Nope. He is trying to convince the decision makers to keep those resources
out of the hands of people who use them to our mutual detriment

Do note that the same people who were getting themselves /15s are also
getting themselves rather large v6 allocations. As soon as more places
adopt v6 they will see much more of the same than they ever experienced on
v4

Keep at the we are not the internet police meme though.. You people have
far more IP space to squander in this manner so that future generations
will surely thank you for the extensively poisoned IP and name space that
they will inherit.

Oh, v6 is never going to run out? I remember people saying exactly that
when class A, B and C addresses were to be had for the asking.

--srs (htc one x)
On 28-Jun-2013 10:18 AM, "Saso G." <saso at eth.si> wrote:

>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 27/06/13 23:50, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> >>> >> And likewise, if said hypothetical LIR obtained the same
> hypothetical /17
> >>> >> two years ago, and since that time has allocated it to a
> "customer" who
> >>> >> then proceeded to fill it only with a single physical machine and on
> >>> >> the order of 32,000 utterly phony baloney domain names, either
> for the
> >>> >> purpose of snowshoe spamming or for the purpose of so-called
> "blackhat
> >>> >> SEO", then there is nothing that anybody within RIPE, or within
> RIPE NCC,
> >>> >> or anywhere in all the world either may or will do about that.
> Is that
> >>> >> a correct interpretation of what you have said?
> >> >
> >> >Yes.
> > So basically, the idea that I had of having these kinds of cooks
> "audited"
> > is utterly futile and pointless, yes?
> >
> > OK.  That's it.  I'm outta here.  I had hoped that something positive
> could
> > be accomplished within this group but now I know that I was just deluding
> > myself.
> >
> > Thanks everybody.  Take care.  I wish you all a nice life.
> Address space is not some commodity that you (or anyone else) should
> assume to own. Instead of turning your focus towards LEGACY protocols,
> that should have been discarded years ago try realizing that IP address
> space is a virtual commodity, limited only by the tech capabilities and
> foresight of the designers building it.
> The fact that someone is taking their time to attemp freeing resources
> from a legacy protocol just proves how much pointless buirocracy there
> is in this world.
>
> Maybe turn it down a notch? You forget this is a decentralized network
> without a central authority, there's only so much a RIR can do...
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRzROAAAoJEKDRRlJA5M0IC7UP/R52f/ddswSWLymPFGo7d9xY
> qqH+zI94mfYLw8NBGYaqdyCuc/LhjA1rW2ziP4wkaznc2Pz7FdgJhWdL//CJNaLz
> /WBAdMPMcFMFyvzzFQjcazJCIv6vUN1ePH1Y8WvjGpBMM1uIC5bHpiJ9Jmau94nk
> hCkdVw8JEfPsCFdOsDX9k1rzQChyCVVNlfXLsHaPkz75Er38hO4KOmAQzE0cp7Xw
> +gmTZG6Ku8Lzl19Nr7O6WRfzZXi5NbEikpe0+yU4dGr75sE7Xig9CodDrLzVO42D
> Kkxu676AYKtcXWaC1kaJzozD25ESM0PEvhkoJTOEC7ZOTtieKRs6ToKpe21kyEhH
> pw56jPUftDTDFdgDXdDwA078fD/dRjYvMFzGNgWi5tFmRymJO9yCv9EYQrPM9TKs
> vkHhirsMPSq9Yn88EAdTaZmG5Hogjcp3d/OtFfkEvHgARJNRXzrJ+e79nS3UGq9L
> iGQWv+pi7hiTmeH45e3cRT5TxLsOAq0sHUNjkz96nnrbZDb8QWofzBNhnaYEEZ1l
> Cp2PvoR3t5uA6nJ8hy7h8pTYKbcgG+66o1c0Tp8C1U8Tb4S/oHJyu3+PA4PnSPh2
> YDrKN6cHlhQpipiGhbI68sJCfusSEoo1koYicoaZbaLVsYPRb+thekMoGBRfAQ83
> DeOp5X5WSX+vgqf3xVok
> =5DpD
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20130628/9759d624/attachment.html>