This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Olaf van der Spek
ml at vdspek.org
Wed Jun 26 16:26:28 CEST 2013
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Frank Gadegast <ripe-anti-spam-wg at powerweb.de> wrote: > Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > > Just want to note, that domainnames themself cant be > dangerous (of course using a similar name could cos > problems with trademarks and the like). What about domain names used to control botnets? Killing the name will ensure the botnet can't reach it's controller, while just killing the service would allow the service to be put back up on another host. Olaf
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]