This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Frank Gadegast
ripe-anti-spam-wg at powerweb.de
Wed Jun 26 16:22:20 CEST 2013
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: Just want to note, that domainnames themself cant be dangerous (of course using a similar name could cos problems with trademarks and the like). Its only the content thats dangerous, eMail or webpage. So its more a problem of the people running the services and these are either hacked sites or ISPs tolerating or deliberatly hosting this content. Asking a TLD registry to remove domainnames because of pishing its then somehow to wrong place to start, specially for Spamhaus, they should know better and simply place all those IPs on their lists ... BTW: just found the service "Google Safe Browsing Alerts for Network Administrators" where every AS owner can register under http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/alerts/ to receive notification about doubtful content Google might find, when spidering your network. This could be pretty usefull to remove pishing and hacked sites for pretty quick. Kind regards, Frank > There are of course multiple sides to that story as well. > > Like a massive infestation of rock phish domains which, too, were > knowingly disregarding local law, and were present in rather massive > quantities on the .at ccTLD at that time. > > http://www.spamhaus.org/organization/statement/7/ > > --srs > > On Wednesday, June 26, 2013, Wilfried Woeber wrote: > > Erik Bais wrote: > [...] > > For those that want to read up on what actually happened on that > specific > > incident in Latvia (July/August 2010), have a read on the > following open > > letter from CERT.lv > > > > https://cert.lv/uploads/uploads/OpenLetter.pdf > > And this actually wasn't the only or the first "incident" with Spamhaus. > They also tried similer *piep*^Wbullying against NIC.at before. > > Which actually has discredited Spamhaus in my personal opinion for sure, > for knowingly disregarding local law, but that's slightly OT here - but > maybe not... > > > Erik Bais > > Wilfried. > > > > -- > --srs (iPad)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]