[anti-abuse-wg] audit proposals

In message <CAArzuosEHQ6RYqnGwXWuCbGzuvqwEk9iH-tis948AcU00iL+fA at mail.gmail.com>
Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists at gmail.com> wrote:

>Entirely depends on the audit's conclusions.
>
>1. Shell company in romania or the ukraine - "the documents say it is a
>registered company". Stop.
>
>2. Hosting snowshoe spam or malware or whatever.  "the justification just
>says "hosting". stop"
>
>:)


I'm not grasping whatever point you were making Suresh.  Can I ask you
to please take another whack at it?

Were you saying that the current audit NCC policies would in fact "stop"
an audit (and declare everything acceptable?) upon learning that the
target of the audit is merely a properly registered company?


Regards,
rfg