This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] audit proposals
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] audit proposals
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] audit proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Tue Jun 25 13:18:44 CEST 2013
Entirely depends on the audit's conclusions. 1. Shell company in romania or the ukraine - "the documents say it is a registered company". Stop. 2. Hosting snowshoe spam or malware or whatever. "the justification just says "hosting". stop" :) On Tuesday, June 25, 2013, Frank Gadegast wrote: > Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > Sounds like a good start ... but I doubt if this should > be the job of the anti-abuse-wg or its chair. > > I would rather prever, if there would be somebody > at the RIPE NCC having this job, and setting up > another wg maillinglist (like abuse-audit at ripe.net) ... > > I personally do not like to be flodded with > discussions about specific networks, that > might or might not be audited again ... > > If this gets changed, Im +1 > > > > -- --srs (iPad) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20130625/d7e8632a/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] audit proposals
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] audit proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]