This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Fri Jun 21 15:33:06 CEST 2013
since when does commercial speech qualify for free speech protection? and yes, outbound mail scanning is a widely recognized best practice no, it would not have helped in the Latvia case because the ISP in question was hosting botnet command and control sites, which don't tend to control bots or run telemetry over smtp. On Friday, June 21, 2013, Sascha Luck wrote: > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 02:50:35PM +0200, peter h wrote: > > A few providers actually prevent spam. Those won't show up in listings. >> To stay out of listings one has to be more then whining, one has to >> actually prevent spam originating! >> > > Just for the avoidance of doubt, are you arguing for the scanning of the > content of outgoing third-party email (aka Censorship) in order to avoid > landing on some blocklist? > > rgds, > Sascha Luck > > > -- --srs (iPad) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20130621/ea1ed38c/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]