This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Reclamation/AAWG charter (was: Re: Allocation of number resources)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Allocation of number resources
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reclamation/AAWG charter (was: Re: Allocation of number resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Sat Feb 9 21:28:34 CET 2013
In message <5116686A.8020208 at heanet.ie>, Brian Nisbet <brian.nisbet at heanet.ie> wrote: >Ronald F. Guilmette wrote, On 08/02/2013 20:07: >> In message <51151006.3070401 at heanet.ie>, >> Brian Nisbet <brian.nisbet at heanet.ie> wrote: >>> The reclamation of resources is not specifically stated in the charter. >>> Of course, should the WG will it, the charter can always be re-examined. >> >> What would be the process for initiating such a change? > >The best way to do it would likely be for a member of the WG to talk to >the the chairs with some suggestions and we can discuss it from there. >But ultimately the WG endorses the charter, so if the WG wants a change, >then a change they shall have. Not being a member of the WG myself, it is reasonable to assume, I think, that I would not be at all a proper person to make a motion to modify the charter in the manner described. I nontheless hope that some member in good standing will see fit to do so. Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Allocation of number resources
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reclamation/AAWG charter (was: Re: Allocation of number resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]