[anti-abuse-wg] Enabling community self-help?

i agree with suresh - ripe has been handing over /15 or even /13 lately to
criminals who know how to use high bandwidth pipes to spam like crazy. I am
not worried about a /24 given to bad guys - but in this world where ipv4
addresses are so scarce, handing over such huge range of addresses is not
correct and it is common sense for everyone to understand this - how can
somebody who did right paper work get /15 without proper justification ?

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:03:36PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> > Due diligence to know your customer norms accepted in most if not all the
> > service provider industry is not "internet policing" and I'm certainly
> not
> > going to block a country at my border routers.
>
> If the customer is not doing anything illegal, their papers are in order
> (contracts on paper arrive at the address given, and come back with
> a signature), and they are paying their fees, what else do you want to
> see for due diligence?
>
> So what?  Not accept customers/members because they don't wash, and smell
> bad?
>
> I wonder when someone will show up and demands to reject LIRs that host
> content for adult entertainment...  because that's illegal in some states
> in the world.
>
> Gert Doering
>        -- NetMaster
> --
> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
>
> SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
> D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
> Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20120329/dfdd5be5/attachment.html>