i agree with suresh - ripe has been handing over /15 or even /13 lately to criminals who know how to use high bandwidth pipes to spam like crazy. I am not worried about a /24 given to bad guys - but in this world where ipv4 addresses are so scarce, handing over such huge range of addresses is not correct and it is common sense for everyone to understand this - how can somebody who did right paper work get /15 without proper justification ? <br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Gert Doering <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gert@space.net">gert@space.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi,<br>
<div class="im"><br>
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:03:36PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:<br>
> Due diligence to know your customer norms accepted in most if not all the<br>
> service provider industry is not "internet policing" and I'm certainly not<br>
> going to block a country at my border routers.<br>
<br>
</div>If the customer is not doing anything illegal, their papers are in order<br>
(contracts on paper arrive at the address given, and come back with<br>
a signature), and they are paying their fees, what else do you want to<br>
see for due diligence?<br>
<br>
So what? Not accept customers/members because they don't wash, and smell bad?<br>
<br>
I wonder when someone will show up and demands to reject LIRs that host<br>
content for adult entertainment... because that's illegal in some states<br>
in the world.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
Gert Doering<br>
-- NetMaster<br>
--<br>
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?<br>
<br>
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard<br>
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann<br>
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)<br>
Tel: <a href="tel:%2B49%20%2889%29%2032356-444" value="+498932356444">+49 (89) 32356-444</a> USt-IdNr.: DE813185279<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>