This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Enabling community self-help?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Enabling community self-help?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Enabling community self-help?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Thu Mar 29 16:47:02 CEST 2012
And I think most countries - not sure about the netherlands - make it "know or ought to have known" Which is where due diligence, know your customer norms etc come in for bankers. On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Vissers, Pepijn <P.Vissers at opta.nl> wrote: > > There's a difference between 'knowing' and 'suspecting'. And if a > company/person knowingly facilitates crime, it could be 'complicity'. Under > circumstances. > > It's another nice busy day here @anti-abuse. -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20120329/feda1e91/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Enabling community self-help?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Enabling community self-help?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]