This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] whois 5C's
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] whois 5C's
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] whois 5C's
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Thu Mar 29 14:14:06 CEST 2012
There's rather a big difference between access to bulk whois data of any sort for security or other "internet community" related, NON COMMERCIAL purposes, versus bulk whois data to run a commercial service. On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 5:40 PM, russ at consumer.net <russ at consumer.net>wrote: > The proposal about the 5 C's sounds good except you also have to include > whois access policies. If you can't get to the data easily and be able to > use it it is of no good. Right now there is a complicated patchwork of > whois access policies. Most of them were made up by a small group of > people who really don't consider all the issues. -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20120329/db48da3c/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] whois 5C's
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] whois 5C's
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]