[anti-abuse-wg] meeting minutes

[pardon for the top post]

@ list at help

Do you believe in consensus? If you do than the consensus of this WG is
very clear. The pace is very slow but atleast in forward direction. Only IMO

Secondly, I requested you humbly to compile a list of real issues with real
work examples and share it with everyone so anyone who failed to understand
the meeting minutes can get the proper insight of real issues. Can you
please point me to that particular mail from archives where you listed all
the "real" issues. I couldnt find any from 'list at help'

Sorry, I don't want to visit the site you mentioned to gather any
information. I went there once and saw loads of google ads and I dont want
to be part of any revenue stream.

Regards,

Aftab A. Siddiqui.

On Thursday, June 14, 2012, lists at help.org <lists at help.org> wrote:
>>This is a working group, the word 'working' implying that some effort is
expected of active participants.
>
> Not all people are active participants.  The vast majority of people
affected are not active participants and some people just want to see what
is going on.
>
>>Non-participants who find the terminology difficult to understand are
better served by less specific information.
>
> I am glad you have decided for all those millions of Internet users what
is best for them.  Basically you are admitting there is no consensus
process and that few people get to decide what everyone else gets to know.
>
> I have already submitted a list of issues several times to this group and
RIPE and nobody wants to describe these issues on the information that is
provided to the Internet community.  I am compiling that information at
http://WhoisSecurity.com.  I still have more work to do and I will be
adding information as I get it but you are free to take any information
there and add it to your various reports.  A couple here people have sent
me suggestions of things to look into and I am getting to it.  I am hoping
to hear back from ARIN, CIRA, and the US Department of Commerce (.us) about
their whois policies and their enforcement as it relates to the information
being harvested, repackaged and sold in whois history reports and the legal
authority behind those banner notices.  I don't expect I will get any solid
answers from those entities but I have made the inquiries.
>
>
>

-- 
Regards,

Aftab A. Siddiqui
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20120614/400f9a48/attachment.html>