[anti-abuse-wg] WhoisSecurity.com

 >I and the NCC will be reporting back to this list and possibly the NCC 
Services list. We won't be updating any forms on your website and that 
would be not only impractical but also not work I'm willing to 
undertake. My and >Tobias' responsibility is to this group, not a random 
website.


You and others on here always suggest that if a problem is detected then 
the community should do something to fix it.  Now you want to change 
your story once that gets done and you don't agree with it.  The reason 
for the web site is because the information being posted here in 
incomplete and, in some cases, intentionally deceptive.   Several people 
have recently posted external web site and they have not been met with 
all the complaints I see here.  Mr. Veseley is the only person to submit 
any kind of legitimate response.  I have been going through the weirds 
and I see some interesting stuff.  I will be going through all the RIR's 
and adding links to their whois processes.  I also see there is a survey 
and comment period for revamping the whois system 
(http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/draft-whois-requirements-survey-30may12-en.htm).  
once I prepare my comments for that i will be updating WhoisSecurity.com 
with the weirds stuff.

Finally, Mr. Nisbet, you should not use the word "responsibility" when 
you refer to yourself as you are completely irresponsible.

Thank You