This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] WhoisSecurity.com
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WhoisSecurity.com
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WhoisSecurity.com
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brian Nisbet
brian.nisbet at heanet.ie
Sun Jun 3 23:00:41 CEST 2012
On 01/06/2012 16:18, lists at help.org wrote: > >While this list does not require introductions or anything of the > sort, it is always nice to at least have a name for a poster. Like I > said, it isn't required, but it might facilitate discussion if people > had some idea who they're talking >to, if that makes any sense? This is > especially useful when you're asking such a broad question. > > No, that does not make sense. The site is compiling resources and the > name of the people compiling the resources is not relevant. You just > want that information so you and people like Michele > Neylon and Dominque Custers can attempt to ridicule the people > developing the site. You guys do this to divert attention from the > misinformation being presented about this issue. I think it facilitates discussion, you disagree, that's up to you, but I think the reactions of the list so far suggest that it does. Anyway, I merely suggested it would help, I didn't request any information. > The RIPE reports on this issue are worthless and the reasons are > explained at: > > http://whoissecurity.com/europeans-restrict-ip-address-whois-data/ > http://whoissecurity.com/historical-whois-data-and-privacy-laws/ > > As for the whois scraping and the packaging and resale of whois data see > > http://whoissecurity.com/historical-whois-data-look-who-sells-it/ > > So as you can see the issues are already researched to a certain extent > but I am sure things have been missed. And as I mentioned the community have asked for a more detailed response from the NCC and I'm hoping to have timelines for this soon. This request came directly from conversation on this list. > Please use the form submission at the site since I do not monitor this > list all the time. I and the NCC will be reporting back to this list and possibly the NCC Services list. We won't be updating any forms on your website and that would be not only impractical but also not work I'm willing to undertake. My and Tobias' responsibility is to this group, not a random website. Brian.
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WhoisSecurity.com
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WhoisSecurity.com
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]