This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Manual vs automated reports
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Manual vs automated reports
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Manual vs automated reports
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alessandro Vesely
vesely at tana.it
Wed Jul 25 13:20:52 CEST 2012
On Wed 25/Jul/2012 11:51:11 +0200 Esa Laitinen wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > >> An alternative is to separate the pipelines for each and every report >> generator. Good abuse reporters may realize that need. > > Well, it is pretty trivial to separate the e-mail to > abuse at mydomain from yahoodle.com (or any other sender) without any > intervention from the reporter, so I really fail to see the need > for separate addresses for various reporters. Well, you need to have received a report from yahoodle.com before you can separate it from the rest. You also need some authentication scheme to ascertain the sender's identity, so it is not so trivial after all. OTOH, asking for the reporter's intervention lets them know that you received their complaint and are doing something about it.
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Manual vs automated reports
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Manual vs automated reports
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]