This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Status of 2011-06
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Status of 2011-06
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Status of 2011-06
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
russ at consumer.net
russ at consumer.net
Thu Jan 12 12:57:32 CET 2012
*2011-06: * *Rationale* *a. Arguments supporting the proposal* It provides a more efficient way for maintainers to organize their provided information and helps to increase accuracy and efficiency in routing abuse reports to the correct network contact. In addition to that, it helps all kinds of institutions to find the correct abuse contact information more easily. *b. Arguments opposing the proposal* None. --- At the same time RIPE is blocking access to abuse contacts claiming they need to protect the data. What exactly is this working group trying to do? Is it to make it easier to route complaints or protect the abuse contacts from spammers? I would also suggest that links be placed to pending proposals on the group's web page at https://www.ripe.net/ripe/groups/wg/anti-abuse. Thank You -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20120112/645eaabd/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Status of 2011-06
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Status of 2011-06
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]