This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Status of 2011-06
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Status of 2011-06
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Status of 2011-06
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brian Nisbet
brian.nisbet at heanet.ie
Thu Jan 12 11:19:48 CET 2012
Chris, "chrish at consol.net" wrote the following on 12/01/2012 10:13: > Hi! > > On 01/12/2012 10:56 AM, Brian Nisbet wrote: >> We hope that any updates to 2011-06 and any responses from the NCC should be with the WG during February. > > I already stated my thoughts on that, but what just strikes me is that 2.0 b) is still "Arguments opposing the proposal: None."... From the point of view of the PDP 2011-06 is still in version 1.0, so section b) of the Rationale may or may not be changed in any new versions. (Yes, I'm being ambiguous here, because I'm not the proposer, but I want to make it clear that no changes have been made to the document since it was put to the WG in November.) Brian.
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Status of 2011-06
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Status of 2011-06
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]