This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Introducing the RIPE NCC Report Form
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Introducing the RIPE NCC Report Form
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Maxis Communications Bhd
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Laura Cobley
laura at ripe.net
Fri Apr 13 12:03:48 CEST 2012
Dear Florian, On 4/11/12 5:31 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Laura Cobley: > >> We ask you to include information such as mail delivery failure notices >> and copies of emails with headers, which clearly show the problem and >> the subsequent difficulties you are having. These help to substantiate >> the report. Our aim is to work together with you to further improve the >> quality of the data in the Internet number resource registry. > > Laura, I'm afraid you haven't answered my question. Let's suppose > I've experienced a reproducible email delivery issue which affects a > role object. I have reported this to related role and person objects > by *email*, but after a reasonable time period, the situation has not > been addressed. I have not sent letters to the postal addresses of > those objects, or have tried the phone and fax numbers. Can I still > use the report form? The different pieces of contact information are all potential ways to get in touch with the Internet number resource holder. If you have difficulties reaching them via any of those details, you can report this to us. I would recommend making a reasonable attempt to contact them first though, for example by giving them a phone call if you find that their email addresses are no longer working. I hope this answers your question. Best regards, Laura Cobley RIPE NCC > > Sorry if this comes across as obnoxious, but among WHOIS operators, > there is a whole spectrum of policies regarding incorrect contact > information, ranging from "we care about a single incorrect email > address" to "we need proof that mail cannot be delivered to that > postal address *and* that no one by that name lives or does business > at that place". I'm just curious where RIPE NCC is located on this > spectrum. >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Introducing the RIPE NCC Report Form
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Maxis Communications Bhd
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]