This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Mon Nov 28 20:00:26 CET 2011
Hi Tobias, [...] > So the questions is just what will happen if somebody does not have an > abuse-c. Since the "abuse-c:" is obligatory, the usual RIPE NCC rules > would apply (not compliance would constitute policy infringement and > would lead to the deregistration of the relevant resources, as described > in the closure and deregistration document under the section c.Incorrect > registration of the allocation/assignment in the RIPE Database: > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-517#b11c and > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-517#b2 > > But please keep in mind, that this process has nothing to do with the > proposal itself. Can you please clarify if the only requirement is that an abuse-c be published? For instance, if an LIR published an abuse-c with 100% bogus contact data, would that meet the requirements and so avoid the address space being reclaimed? Thanks, Leo
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]