[anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)

Hi,

> Do the proposers intend the requirement for the "abuse-mailbox:" 
> attribute to be enforced in any way and if so, how?

Not having an abuse-mailbox attribute in any object will lead to not
being able to reference an object by the abuse-c. Because business rules
will request this.

So the questions is just what will happen if somebody does not have an
abuse-c. Since the "abuse-c:" is obligatory, the usual RIPE NCC rules
would apply (not compliance would constitute policy infringement and
would lead to the deregistration of the relevant resources, as described
in the closure and deregistration document under the section c.Incorrect
registration of the allocation/assignment in the RIPE Database:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-517#b11c and
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-517#b2

But please keep in mind, that this process has nothing to do with the
proposal itself.

Thanks,

Tobias

-- 
abusix

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20111124/1eb39719/attachment.sig>