[anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)

+1 .. i fully agree that this aspect needs to be thought out first

--srs (iPad)

On 25-Nov-2011, at 16:23, Aftab Siddiqui <aftab.siddiqui at gmail.com> wrote:

>  
> Hi Tobias,
>  
> This is an operational issue and can not be a 100% defined at this
> point. The idea is, to transfer as much information as possible to the
> system automatically. So from this point we could for example use a
> admin-c or tech-c object that has already an abuse-mailbox as abuse-c as
> well. That is one possibility. There probably will be a notification of
> all members. There will be a cleanup process. But at the moment it is
> much to early to define these things. And in addition to that, the
> process of implementing and transition should not be part of the policy,
> because once the policy is in place and all transitions have been made,
> nobody will care about it anymore.
>  
> Yes, I agree its an operational issue, but there must be some deliberation from the RIPE NCC team regarding the implementation.
>  
> Same what happens if somebody does not comply with any other policy.
> RIPE NCC will take care with the already defined processes that are in
> place right at the moment.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> And it doesn't involve the correctness of information provided and incorrect info will be dealt with in the same manner? right? again its an operational thing.
>  
> Regards,
> 
> Aftab A. Siddiqui
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20111125/4c3e2015/attachment.html>