This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Abuse finder tweak? Re: inetnum: 212.86.64.0 - 212.86.79.255
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse finder tweak? Re: inetnum: 212.86.64.0 - 212.86.79.255
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 Policy Proposal Withdrawn (Abuse Contact Information)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Aftab Siddiqui
aftab.siddiqui at gmail.com
Tue May 10 13:53:21 CEST 2011
Hi Tobias, Nice to see that. I wasn't following the task force working (my bad). IRT is not a perfect solution because you can't guarantee if the address provided is active or not. Most of the times the email boxes are full and we get bounce response. But anyhow most of the times if works. anyways, best of luck. Regards, Aftab A. Siddiqui On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Tobias Knecht <tk at abusix.com> wrote: > Am 10.05.11 12:15, schrieb Aftab Siddiqui: > > isnt it a good test case for having IRT object in RIPE db as well. > > Absolutely right. There is already a TaskForce in place to discuss the > possibilities. http://www.ripe.net/ripe/groups/tf/abuse-contact > > Thanks, > > Tobias > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20110510/22681cac/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse finder tweak? Re: inetnum: 212.86.64.0 - 212.86.79.255
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 Policy Proposal Withdrawn (Abuse Contact Information)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]