This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Abuse finder tweak? Re: inetnum: 212.86.64.0 - 212.86.79.255
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse finder tweak? Re: inetnum: 212.86.64.0 - 212.86.79.255
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse finder tweak? Re: inetnum: 212.86.64.0 - 212.86.79.255
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tobias Knecht
tk at abusix.com
Tue May 10 13:20:37 CEST 2011
Am 10.05.11 12:15, schrieb Aftab Siddiqui: > isnt it a good test case for having IRT object in RIPE db as well. Absolutely right. There is already a TaskForce in place to discuss the possibilities. http://www.ripe.net/ripe/groups/tf/abuse-contact Thanks, Tobias -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 267 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20110510/8b435448/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse finder tweak? Re: inetnum: 212.86.64.0 - 212.86.79.255
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse finder tweak? Re: inetnum: 212.86.64.0 - 212.86.79.255
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]