This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] RIPE policy
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE policy
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Wed Mar 9 02:00:17 CET 2011
He isn't talking about any of the legitimate use cases here Not connectivity providers of any sort Not anycast Not multihomed, international corporations Acquiring extremely large netblocks solely for net abuse is something that goes on, on a grand scale in the RIPE region, compared to any other RIR in the world It is a fact you will have to acknowledge first before you can even begin to put in place any measures to stop it .. and that does not seem to be the case as far as I can see. --srs On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda at icann.org> wrote: > > I asked you to clarify what you meant and gave an example of a legitimate situation. > > Asking again: do you mean selling connectivity services? > > Selling address blocks without connectivity is different from selling them with it. > -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE policy
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]