[anti-abuse-wg] RIPE policy

On Mar 8, 2011, at 3:57 PM, "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg at tristatelogic.com> wrote:

[...]

> 
>> 
>>>   Rather, I was wondering more about the apparent
>>> re-assignment (re-selling?) of RIPE IP space, en mass, to parties outside
>>> of the RIPE geographic jurisdiction.
>> 
>> Do you mean selling IP connectivity to networks outside the region? That is=
>> fairly common and not unreasonable. For instance, satellite connectivity p=
>> roviders often have customers in fairly remote locations.
> 
> The several cases I posted are _not_ ``satellite connectivity providers'',
> and these are _not_ just, like, /28s and /29s we are talking about here.

I asked you to clarify what you meant and gave an example of a legitimate situation.

Asking again: do you mean selling connectivity services?

Selling address blocks without connectivity is different from selling them with it.

Regards,

Leo