This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] blacklisted by the RIPE NCC --was Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes ? RIPE 61
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] blacklisted by the RIPE NCC --was Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes ? RIPE 61
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes ? RIPE 61
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kostas Zorbadelos
kzorba at otenet.gr
Thu Feb 3 10:15:54 CET 2011
On 02/02/2011 08:07 PM, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > What does it mean "A task force will be organised to solve the > implementation issues pointed out by the proposal discussion"? Is it > something that is going to land on this mailing list, sometimes? I don't mind a few talks in a more closed circle to avoid a possible noise in discussions, but I certainly expect the outcome in this public list to be discussed openly. Otherwise, what is the meaning of an "open" Working Group? Regards, Kostas
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] blacklisted by the RIPE NCC --was Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes ? RIPE 61
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes ? RIPE 61
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]