This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes ? RIPE 61
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] blacklisted by the RIPE NCC --was Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes ? RIPE 61
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes ? RIPE 61
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Thu Feb 3 02:31:35 CET 2011
That's not what we are driving at, at all. I would be interested in seeing the status of the Rasmussen and Knecht proposals once they go forward. On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda at icann.org> wrote: > > If some people want particular individuals or companies to be blacklisted by the RIPE NCC then they need to make a formal proposal along those lines. I have not seen a proposal for a RIPE NCC operated blacklist of known blaggards who must not be allowed access to IP addresses but would be interested in reviewing a proposal if it is forthcoming. -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] blacklisted by the RIPE NCC --was Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes ? RIPE 61
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes ? RIPE 61
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]