This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes - RIPE 61
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes - RIPE 61
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes - RIPE 61
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Tue Feb 1 17:16:59 CET 2011
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Dave CROCKER <dcrocker at bbiw.net> wrote: > But note that Richard's note contained none of these particulars. I read it in the context of earlier articles he posted here and elsewhere such as on the spamhaus website. And also in the context of http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/listings.lasso?isp=RIPE [and in advance to those that would like to point it out - yes please, I know ripe isnt an isp, and I guess so does richard] -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes - RIPE 61
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes - RIPE 61
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]