This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes - RIPE 61
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes - RIPE 61
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes - RIPE 61
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Tue Feb 1 16:51:08 CET 2011
I thought we were talking about IP allocation, detecting shell companies and fake paperwork here, dave. If there were registrar rather than RIR issues involved I'd probably phrase that differently On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Dave CROCKER <dhc at dcrocker.net> wrote: > > The challenge in making comparative references like this is to make sure the > comparison has a reasonable basis. So, for example, banks are not expected > to give loans to everyone. They are in fact /required/ to discriminate. > (However even banks have limitations on the nature or extent of that > discrimination.) > > A core problem with calls for differential handling of "abusive" domain > registrations is that it opens the door to abuses by the authority. > -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes - RIPE 61
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes - RIPE 61
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]