[anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision, was 2011-06 New Policy

Yes, FAQ#6 is to be removed as well.

On 12/Dec/11 17:49, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Instead of all that I'd focus on this little nugget from the faq.
> Which was, is and will remain central to why this wg was set up in the
> first place.
> 
> ________
> 
> Why are there no contact details or incorrect contact details for
> reporting spam email listed in the RIPE Database for the IP address I
> searched on? →
> 
> The records in the Regional Internet Registries' (RIR) databases are
> entered and maintained by the organisations that receive IP addresses
> from each RIR. The RIRs do not check the accuracy of any of the
> records in the database or make any changes to the data maintained by
> these organisations. The RIPE NCC has no power to update any of these
> records.
> 
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Alessandro Vesely <vesely at tana.it> wrote:
>> That would be fine too.  It's far better not to have a "Hacking &
>> Spamming" section [1] in the FAQ than having wrong entries.  Is it
>> possible to remove it?
>>
>> [1] http://www.ripe.net/data-tools/db/faq/faq-hacking-spamming
>>
>