This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision, was 2011-06 New Policy
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision, was 2011-06 New Policy
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision, was 2011-06 New Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Mon Dec 12 17:49:34 CET 2011
Instead of all that I'd focus on this little nugget from the faq. Which was, is and will remain central to why this wg was set up in the first place. ________ Why are there no contact details or incorrect contact details for reporting spam email listed in the RIPE Database for the IP address I searched on? → The records in the Regional Internet Registries' (RIR) databases are entered and maintained by the organisations that receive IP addresses from each RIR. The RIRs do not check the accuracy of any of the records in the database or make any changes to the data maintained by these organisations. The RIPE NCC has no power to update any of these records. On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Alessandro Vesely <vesely at tana.it> wrote: > That would be fine too. It's far better not to have a "Hacking & > Spamming" section [1] in the FAQ than having wrong entries. Is it > possible to remove it? > > [1] http://www.ripe.net/data-tools/db/faq/faq-hacking-spamming >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision, was 2011-06 New Policy
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision, was 2011-06 New Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]