This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Proposal for technical details for abuse contact information in the RIPE Database
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Proposal for technical details for abuse contact information in the RIPE Database
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Proposal for technical details for abuse contact information in the RIPE Database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Adrian
ripe-wg-antiabuse at kyubu.de
Thu Dec 1 15:58:34 CET 2011
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 03:24:05PM +0100, Frank Gadegast wrote: hi, > You forgot about bigger ISPs that likes to report abuse > automatically in standarized formats (and what most abuse departments > really LIKE to receive). True, but this is an orthogonal problem. > An unrestricted abuse contact really helps here a lot. Like, the abuse mailbox defined in RFC 2142? > But to be honest: no restriction helps that your email > address ends up in a spammers list, they have more Adding arbitrary restrictions doesn't prevent that either. > power you can dream of (I even heared that they pay > people to enter captcha codes). Yes. Cheers, Adrian
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Proposal for technical details for abuse contact information in the RIPE Database
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Proposal for technical details for abuse contact information in the RIPE Database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]