This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Abuse Complaints, Audits and Reports
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Abuse Complaints, Audits and Reports
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Abuse Complaints, Audits and Reports
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
James Davis
james.davis at ja.net
Wed Aug 17 16:20:23 CEST 2011
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 17/08/2011 14:29, Athina Fragkouli wrote: > - 2011: 234 audits, 124 are complete, two LIRs were closed as a > result of the audits, two PI assignments were deregistered, 110 > audits are ongoing > > For confidentiality reasons, the RIPE NCC does not report on > individual audits, on the changes/amendments made in the audits or on > the comments/communication with the LIR during the audit. I think that there needs to be a balance between the privacy and transparency in the process. In another community I participate in, when a member doesn't meet the requirements for membership and is formally investigated for that failure - a concise and factual e-mail is sent to the rest of the community so that we understand why they have left. The statements are never defamatory - usually something like 'Following a complaint about y, Foo failed to meet requirement x, and since they did not respond to our concerns or correct this issue within the time given, they have been removed.' I've noticed that a LIR and PI assignment I complained about earlier in the year have disappeared. I can't be sure that it's one of those, but I'm assuming that it is. The LIR seemed to exist only to provide a single PI assignment to a company that didn't exist, and the allocation was being used for abuse. > Because we are in the process of setting this up, we welcome your > feedback and any experiences you would like to share on this mailing > list. We will not comment on each and every suggestion, but we will > take the feedback/comments into account in developing this new > procedure. If I can confirm with you that my report was related to one of these cases, would it be useful for me to give an account of my experience here? Regards, James - -- James Davis 0300 999 2340 (+44 1235 822340) Senior CSIRT Member Lumen House, Library Avenue, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0SG -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREIAAYFAk5LzicACgkQjsS2Y6D6yLzROAEAm6AIdhM0mma2VHYcPVnGRiwF eI4pbsrqAjajlowSsU8A/1MMhwkcN8EHyjZPlRJlpjkMsWD4vE96BAtFPV+MF9F4 =x1NE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- JANET(UK) is a trading name of The JNT Association, a company limited by guarantee which is registered in England under No. 2881024 and whose Registered Office is at Lumen House, Library Avenue, Harwell Oxford, Didcot, Oxfordshire. OX11 0SG
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Abuse Complaints, Audits and Reports
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Abuse Complaints, Audits and Reports
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]