Education - was Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database - YES

On 08/11/2011 03:05 AM, Aftab Siddiqui wrote: · Thu Aug 11 10:17:43 CEST 2011

Re bounces - I got them too

Mr. Michele Neylon
Blacknight
http://Blacknight.tel

Via iPhone so excuse typos and brevity

On 11 Aug 2011, at 07:16, "Kostas Zorbadelos" <kzorba at otenet.gr> wrote:

> On 08/11/2011 03:05 AM, Aftab Siddiqui wrote:
>> So Brian, being the chair, is there any possibility to sum up few
>> things here like the problem statement (I guess it was fake Whois
>> initially) because as suresh said 3-4 ppl will always going to debate
>> on the same issues again n again than why not these ppl can come up
>> with a suggestion towards solution.
>> 
> 
> I totally agree with this one. A summary of the problem statement(s) would be a 
> good thing because I think I am not the only one that lost track of the recent 
> conversations.
> 
> Kostas
> 
> PS: Am I the only one that received some bounces from this list? 
> Example follows:
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Return-Path: <>
> X-Original-To: kzorba at noc.otenet.gr
> Delivered-To: kzorba at noc.otenet.gr
> Received: from sirius.otenet.gr (sirius.otenet.gr [83.235.66.60])
>    by noc.otenet.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C568B8030
>    for <kzorba at noc.otenet.gr>; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:21:57 +0300 (EEST)
> Received: from postboy.ripe.net (postboy.ripe.net [193.0.19.3])
>    by sirius.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p7AALq3C025591
>    for <kzorba at otenet.gr>; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:21:55 +0300
> Received: by postboy.ripe.net (Postfix)
>    id A01FE6A11F; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:21:52 +0200 (CEST)
> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:21:52 +0200 (CEST)
> From: MAILER-DAEMON at ripe.net (Mail Delivery System)
> Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
> To: kzorba at otenet.gr
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status;
>    boundary="98DBC6A11C.1312971712/postboy.ripe.net"
> Message-Id: <20110810102152.A01FE6A11F at postboy.ripe.net>
> 
> This is a MIME-encapsulated message.
> 
> --98DBC6A11C.1312971712/postboy.ripe.net
> Content-Description: Notification
> Content-Type: text/plain
> 
> This is the Postfix program at host postboy.ripe.net.
> 
> I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
> be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
> 
> For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster>
> 
> If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
> delete your own text from the attached returned message.
> 
>            The Postfix program
> 
> <anti-abuse-wg at lists.ripe.net>: mail forwarding loop for
>    anti-abuse-wg at lists.ripe.net
> 
> --98DBC6A11C.1312971712/postboy.ripe.net
> Content-Description: Delivery report
> Content-Type: message/delivery-status
> 
> Reporting-MTA: dns; postboy.ripe.net
> X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 98DBC6A11C
> X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; kzorba at otenet.gr
> Arrival-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:21:52 +0200 (CEST)
> 
> Final-Recipient: rfc822; anti-abuse-wg at lists.ripe.net
> Action: failed
> Status: 5.0.0
> Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; mail forwarding loop for
>    anti-abuse-wg at lists.ripe.net
> 
> --98DBC6A11C.1312971712/postboy.ripe.net
> Content-Description: Undelivered Message
> Content-Type: message/rfc822
> 
> Received: from postgirl.ripe.net (postgirl.ripe.net [193.0.19.66])
>    (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
>    (No client certificate requested)
>    by postboy.ripe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98DBC6A11C
>    for <anti-abuse-wg at lists.ripe.net>; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:21:52 +0200 (CEST)
> Received: from r-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com ([217.108.152.41])
>    by postgirl.ripe.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
>    (envelope-from <kzorba at otenet.gr>)
>    id 1Qr5v4-0003JH-7T
>    for anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:21:52 +0200
> Received: from r-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
>    by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 8CC2A738009
>    for <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net>; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:23:09 +0200 (CEST)
> Received: from ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.46])
>    by r-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83AE07B8010
>    for <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net>; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:23:09 +0200 (CEST)
> Received: from ftrdsmtp4.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.49]) by ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675);
>     Wed, 10 Aug 2011 11:57:46 +0200
> Received: from mail pickup service by ftrdsmtp4.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
>     Wed, 10 Aug 2011 02:13:41 +0200
> Received: from omfeda08.si.francetelecom.fr ([10.98.3.82]) by ftrdsmtp4.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675);
>     Tue, 9 Aug 2011 13:22:37 +0200
> Received: from omfeda13.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.98.77.165])
>    by omfeda08.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 1B72C38404A
>    for <pierre.caron at orange-ftgroup.com>; Tue,  9 Aug 2011 13:22:07 +0200 (CEST)
> Received: from omfeda13.si.francetelecom.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
>    by omfeda13.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with SMTP id 07C411905F3
>    for <pierre.caron at orange-ftgroup.com>; Tue,  9 Aug 2011 13:22:07 +0200 (CEST)
> Received: from postboy.ripe.net (postboy.ripe.net [193.0.19.3])
>    (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
>    (No client certificate requested)
>    by relais-inet.francetelecom.com (ESMTP service) with ESMTPS id 902A01905F0
>    for <pierre.caron at orange-ftgroup.com>; Tue,  9 Aug 2011 13:22:06 +0200 (CEST)
> Received: from postboy.ripe.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
>    by postboy.ripe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBDB36A09A;
>    Tue,  9 Aug 2011 13:22:02 +0200 (CEST)
> X-Original-To: anti-abuse-wg at lists.ripe.net
> Delivered-To: anti-abuse-wg at lists.ripe.net
> Received: from postgirl.ripe.net (postgirl.ripe.net [193.0.19.66])
>    (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
>    (No client certificate requested)
>    by postboy.ripe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF9D06A099
>    for <anti-abuse-wg at lists.ripe.net>; Tue,  9 Aug 2011 13:21:34 +0200 (CEST)
> Received: from noc.otenet.gr ([195.170.0.29])
>    by postgirl.ripe.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
>    (envelope-from <kzorba at otenet.gr>)
>    id 1QqkNI-00040Y-JN
>    for anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 13:21:34 +0200
> Received: from [212.205.221.137] (enigma.otenet.gr [212.205.221.137])
>    by noc.otenet.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8ADB8B8030
>    for <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net>; Tue,  9 Aug 2011 14:21:31 +0300 (EEST)
> Message-ID: <4E4118CF.2050201 at otenet.gr>
> From: Kostas Zorbadelos <kzorba at otenet.gr>
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.11
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> To: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net
> Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse report.
> References: <4e402a95.3020409 at eunet.rs>  <452d9c4ceeb.000000e3world.antispam.report at inbox.com> <459BAB01B7D.0000016Bworld.antispam.report at inbox.com>
> In-Reply-To: <459BAB01B7D.0000016Bworld.antispam.report at inbox.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-RIPE-Spam-Level: --
> X-RIPE-Spam-Report: Spam Total Points:   -2.7 points
>  pts rule name              description
> ---- ---------------------- ------------------------------------
> -0.8 RP_MATCHES_RCVD        Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain
> -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
>                             [score: 0.0000]
> X-RIPE-Signature: e75c1e1f8fb33358b75e61b940efb654473ccce5d76a543f49de81d3f8adb7a7
> Sender: anti-abuse-wg-admin at ripe.net
> Errors-To: anti-abuse-wg-admin at ripe.net
> X-BeenThere: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net
> X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13
> Precedence: bulk
> List-Id: Discussion of anti-abuse measures <anti-abuse-wg.ripe.net>
> List-Post: <mailto:anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net>
> X-RIPE-Lists: Discussion of anti-abuse measures <anti-abuse-wg.ripe.net>
> List-Subscribe: <http://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/anti-abuse-wg>,
>    <mailto:anti-abuse-wg-request at ripe.net?subject=subscribe>
> List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/anti-abuse-wg>,
>    <mailto:anti-abuse-wg-request at ripe.net?subject=unsubscribe>
> List-Help: <mailto:anti-abuse-wg-request at ripe.net?subject=help>
> List-Archive: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/
> Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 14:23:59 +0300
> X-PMX-Version: 5.5.9.395186, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2011.8.9.111515
> X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=X, Probability=10%, Report='
> TO_IN_SUBJECT 0.5, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_400_499 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, SPF_NONE 0, __ANY_URI 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __DATE_TZ_RU 0, __HAS_LIST_HEADER 0, __HAS_LIST_HELP 0, __HAS_LIST_SUBSCRIBE 0, __HAS_LIST_UNSUBSCRIBE 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __MOZILLA_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __TO_NO_NAME 0, __URI_NS , __USER_AGENT 0'
> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Aug 2011 11:22:37.0321 (UTC) FILETIME=[A48CF790:01CC5686]
> X-RIPE-Spam-Level: -
> X-RIPE-Spam-Report: Spam Total Points:   -1.9 points
>  pts rule name              description
> ---- ---------------------- ------------------------------------
> -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
>                             [score: 0.0000]
> X-RIPE-Signature: e75c1e1f8fb33358b75e61b940efb654473ccce5d76a543f49de81d3f8adb7a7
> 
> On 08/09/2011 02:15 PM, abuse at localhost.com wrote:
>> James? Have you noticed the name of this present mailing list?\
>> Why would there be the word "anti-abuse" in it?
>> Is an uncared for spam complaint "Off Topic"?
>> 
>> I don't think so.
>> ==============================
>> 
> 
> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/groups/wg/anti-abuse
> 
> Please, I think we should lower the noise of these threads.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Kostas
> 
> 
> --98DBC6A11C.1312971712/postboy.ripe.net--
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>> M2C
>> 
>> On Wednesday, August 10, 2011, Brian Nisbet<brian.nisbet at heanet.ie>  wrote:
>>>  "Suresh Ramasubramanian" wrote the following on 10/08/2011 15:38:
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight
>>> <michele at blacknight.ie>    wrote:
>>> 
>>> Odd that it came up here as well .. there's a similar-ish discussion about definitions going on in APWG as well ..
>>> 
>>> 
>>> There have been periodic threads on this in just about every antispam
>>> mailing list and newsgroup that I have been part of, for over 15 years
>>> now.
>>> 
>>> The more mature lists soon grow out of it, or at least reduce the
>>> frequency of this discussion which speedily goes into a quibbling and
>>> hair splitting exercise engaged in by like three or four people [often
>>> the same 3 or 4 people each time, go figure]
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thank you for answering that, Suresh. While I do wonder what definitions people are looking for, you have just said, in an excellent way, what I was thinking of saying.
>>> 
>>> Brian.
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 