This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
Education - was Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database - YES
- Previous message (by thread): Education - was Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database - YES
- Next message (by thread): Education - was Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database - YES
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kostas Zorbadelos
kzorba at otenet.gr
Thu Aug 11 08:17:57 CEST 2011
On 08/11/2011 03:05 AM, Aftab Siddiqui wrote: > So Brian, being the chair, is there any possibility to sum up few > things here like the problem statement (I guess it was fake Whois > initially) because as suresh said 3-4 ppl will always going to debate > on the same issues again n again than why not these ppl can come up > with a suggestion towards solution. > I totally agree with this one. A summary of the problem statement(s) would be a good thing because I think I am not the only one that lost track of the recent conversations. Kostas PS: Am I the only one that received some bounces from this list? Example follows: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Return-Path: <> X-Original-To: kzorba at noc.otenet.gr Delivered-To: kzorba at noc.otenet.gr Received: from sirius.otenet.gr (sirius.otenet.gr [83.235.66.60]) by noc.otenet.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C568B8030 for <kzorba at noc.otenet.gr>; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:21:57 +0300 (EEST) Received: from postboy.ripe.net (postboy.ripe.net [193.0.19.3]) by sirius.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p7AALq3C025591 for <kzorba at otenet.gr>; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:21:55 +0300 Received: by postboy.ripe.net (Postfix) id A01FE6A11F; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:21:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:21:52 +0200 (CEST) From: MAILER-DAEMON at ripe.net (Mail Delivery System) Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender To: kzorba at otenet.gr MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary="98DBC6A11C.1312971712/postboy.ripe.net" Message-Id: <20110810102152.A01FE6A11F at postboy.ripe.net> This is a MIME-encapsulated message. --98DBC6A11C.1312971712/postboy.ripe.net Content-Description: Notification Content-Type: text/plain This is the Postfix program at host postboy.ripe.net. I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below. For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster> If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the attached returned message. The Postfix program <anti-abuse-wg at lists.ripe.net>: mail forwarding loop for anti-abuse-wg at lists.ripe.net --98DBC6A11C.1312971712/postboy.ripe.net Content-Description: Delivery report Content-Type: message/delivery-status Reporting-MTA: dns; postboy.ripe.net X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 98DBC6A11C X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; kzorba at otenet.gr Arrival-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:21:52 +0200 (CEST) Final-Recipient: rfc822; anti-abuse-wg at lists.ripe.net Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; mail forwarding loop for anti-abuse-wg at lists.ripe.net --98DBC6A11C.1312971712/postboy.ripe.net Content-Description: Undelivered Message Content-Type: message/rfc822 Received: from postgirl.ripe.net (postgirl.ripe.net [193.0.19.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by postboy.ripe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98DBC6A11C for <anti-abuse-wg at lists.ripe.net>; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:21:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com ([217.108.152.41]) by postgirl.ripe.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <kzorba at otenet.gr>) id 1Qr5v4-0003JH-7T for anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:21:52 +0200 Received: from r-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 8CC2A738009 for <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net>; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:23:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.46]) by r-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83AE07B8010 for <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net>; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:23:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ftrdsmtp4.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.49]) by ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 10 Aug 2011 11:57:46 +0200 Received: from mail pickup service by ftrdsmtp4.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 02:13:41 +0200 Received: from omfeda08.si.francetelecom.fr ([10.98.3.82]) by ftrdsmtp4.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 9 Aug 2011 13:22:37 +0200 Received: from omfeda13.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.98.77.165]) by omfeda08.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 1B72C38404A for <pierre.caron at orange-ftgroup.com>; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 13:22:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from omfeda13.si.francetelecom.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by omfeda13.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with SMTP id 07C411905F3 for <pierre.caron at orange-ftgroup.com>; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 13:22:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from postboy.ripe.net (postboy.ripe.net [193.0.19.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relais-inet.francetelecom.com (ESMTP service) with ESMTPS id 902A01905F0 for <pierre.caron at orange-ftgroup.com>; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 13:22:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from postboy.ripe.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postboy.ripe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBDB36A09A; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 13:22:02 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: anti-abuse-wg at lists.ripe.net Delivered-To: anti-abuse-wg at lists.ripe.net Received: from postgirl.ripe.net (postgirl.ripe.net [193.0.19.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by postboy.ripe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF9D06A099 for <anti-abuse-wg at lists.ripe.net>; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 13:21:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from noc.otenet.gr ([195.170.0.29]) by postgirl.ripe.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <kzorba at otenet.gr>) id 1QqkNI-00040Y-JN for anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 13:21:34 +0200 Received: from [212.205.221.137] (enigma.otenet.gr [212.205.221.137]) by noc.otenet.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8ADB8B8030 for <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net>; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 14:21:31 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <4E4118CF.2050201 at otenet.gr> From: Kostas Zorbadelos <kzorba at otenet.gr> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse report. References: <4e402a95.3020409 at eunet.rs> <452d9c4ceeb.000000e3world.antispam.report at inbox.com> <459BAB01B7D.0000016Bworld.antispam.report at inbox.com> In-Reply-To: <459BAB01B7D.0000016Bworld.antispam.report at inbox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RIPE-Spam-Level: -- X-RIPE-Spam-Report: Spam Total Points: -2.7 points pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- ------------------------------------ -0.8 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-RIPE-Signature: e75c1e1f8fb33358b75e61b940efb654473ccce5d76a543f49de81d3f8adb7a7 Sender: anti-abuse-wg-admin at ripe.net Errors-To: anti-abuse-wg-admin at ripe.net X-BeenThere: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Id: Discussion of anti-abuse measures <anti-abuse-wg.ripe.net> List-Post: <mailto:anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> X-RIPE-Lists: Discussion of anti-abuse measures <anti-abuse-wg.ripe.net> List-Subscribe: <http://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/anti-abuse-wg>, <mailto:anti-abuse-wg-request at ripe.net?subject=subscribe> List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/anti-abuse-wg>, <mailto:anti-abuse-wg-request at ripe.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Help: <mailto:anti-abuse-wg-request at ripe.net?subject=help> List-Archive: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/ Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 14:23:59 +0300 X-PMX-Version: 5.5.9.395186, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2011.8.9.111515 X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=X, Probability=10%, Report=' TO_IN_SUBJECT 0.5, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_400_499 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, SPF_NONE 0, __ANY_URI 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __DATE_TZ_RU 0, __HAS_LIST_HEADER 0, __HAS_LIST_HELP 0, __HAS_LIST_SUBSCRIBE 0, __HAS_LIST_UNSUBSCRIBE 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __MOZILLA_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __TO_NO_NAME 0, __URI_NS , __USER_AGENT 0' X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Aug 2011 11:22:37.0321 (UTC) FILETIME=[A48CF790:01CC5686] X-RIPE-Spam-Level: - X-RIPE-Spam-Report: Spam Total Points: -1.9 points pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- ------------------------------------ -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-RIPE-Signature: e75c1e1f8fb33358b75e61b940efb654473ccce5d76a543f49de81d3f8adb7a7 On 08/09/2011 02:15 PM, abuse at localhost.com wrote: > James? Have you noticed the name of this present mailing list?\ > Why would there be the word "anti-abuse" in it? > Is an uncared for spam complaint "Off Topic"? > > I don't think so. > ============================== > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/groups/wg/anti-abuse Please, I think we should lower the noise of these threads. Regards, Kostas --98DBC6A11C.1312971712/postboy.ripe.net-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > M2C > > On Wednesday, August 10, 2011, Brian Nisbet<brian.nisbet at heanet.ie> wrote: >> "Suresh Ramasubramanian" wrote the following on 10/08/2011 15:38: >> >> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight >> <michele at blacknight.ie> wrote: >> >> Odd that it came up here as well .. there's a similar-ish discussion about definitions going on in APWG as well .. >> >> >> There have been periodic threads on this in just about every antispam >> mailing list and newsgroup that I have been part of, for over 15 years >> now. >> >> The more mature lists soon grow out of it, or at least reduce the >> frequency of this discussion which speedily goes into a quibbling and >> hair splitting exercise engaged in by like three or four people [often >> the same 3 or 4 people each time, go figure] >> >> >> Thank you for answering that, Suresh. While I do wonder what definitions people are looking for, you have just said, in an excellent way, what I was thinking of saying. >> >> Brian. >> >> >
- Previous message (by thread): Education - was Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database - YES
- Next message (by thread): Education - was Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database - YES
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]