This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
Education - was Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database - YES
- Previous message (by thread): Education - was Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database - YES
- Next message (by thread): Education - was Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database - YES
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brian Nisbet
brian.nisbet at heanet.ie
Wed Aug 10 16:40:42 CEST 2011
"Suresh Ramasubramanian" wrote the following on 10/08/2011 15:38: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight > <michele at blacknight.ie> wrote: >> Odd that it came up here as well .. there's a similar-ish discussion about definitions going on in APWG as well .. > > There have been periodic threads on this in just about every antispam > mailing list and newsgroup that I have been part of, for over 15 years > now. > > The more mature lists soon grow out of it, or at least reduce the > frequency of this discussion which speedily goes into a quibbling and > hair splitting exercise engaged in by like three or four people [often > the same 3 or 4 people each time, go figure] Thank you for answering that, Suresh. While I do wonder what definitions people are looking for, you have just said, in an excellent way, what I was thinking of saying. Brian.
- Previous message (by thread): Education - was Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database - YES
- Next message (by thread): Education - was Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database - YES
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]