This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
Education - was Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database - YES
- Previous message (by thread): Education - was Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database - YES
- Next message (by thread): Education - was Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database - YES
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Wed Aug 10 16:38:29 CEST 2011
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight <michele at blacknight.ie> wrote: > Odd that it came up here as well .. there's a similar-ish discussion about definitions going on in APWG as well .. There have been periodic threads on this in just about every antispam mailing list and newsgroup that I have been part of, for over 15 years now. The more mature lists soon grow out of it, or at least reduce the frequency of this discussion which speedily goes into a quibbling and hair splitting exercise engaged in by like three or four people [often the same 3 or 4 people each time, go figure] -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)
- Previous message (by thread): Education - was Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database - YES
- Next message (by thread): Education - was Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database - YES
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]