This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Tue Aug 9 03:41:50 CEST 2011
Those are not all hijacked. They're also assigned PI / PA netblocks sourced directly from the RIR RIPE has to bear the cross of Romania which alone is responsible for a substantial chunk of those too many to list - including several /15s There's also the rest of eastern europe and russia with smaller assigned PI and PA netblocks controlled by botmasters and such. In any case, too many to list. Never mind the "ISP" there - spamhaus used the same script they use to generate per ISP reports of SBL listings. On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 11:57 PM, Karl-Josef Ziegler <kjz at gmx.net> wrote: > > RIPE: has far too many records to list. This ISP has an extremely > serious spam problem. > > http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/listings.lasso?isp=arin > > Hmmm... 'extremely serious spam problem'? Only RIPE 'has far too many > records to list.' > > What's this? -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]