This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Here's a few factual examples Wilfried:=>
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Karl-Josef Ziegler
kjz at gmx.net
Mon Aug 8 20:27:39 CEST 2011
> They define "hijacked netblocks" in > http://www.spamhaus.org/faq/answers.lasso?section=DROP%20FAQ#258 And, if you look it up there: http://www.spamhaus.org/rokso/evidence.lasso?rokso_id=ROK2493 you can get: APNIC: 18 listings http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/listings.lasso?isp=apnic ARIN: 258 listings http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/listings.lasso?isp=arin LACNIC: 26 listings http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/listings.lasso?isp=lacnic RIPE: has far too many records to list. This ISP has an extremely serious spam problem. http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/listings.lasso?isp=arin Hmmm... 'extremely serious spam problem'? Only RIPE 'has far too many records to list.' What's this? Best regards, - Karl-Josef
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Here's a few factual examples Wilfried:=>
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]