This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Reporting Fraud
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reporting Fraud
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reporting Fraud
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Cox
richard.cox at btuser.net
Thu Sep 30 12:50:52 CEST 2010
Piotr Strzyzewski <Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl> wrote: > According to my memory and to the minutes from the session > there were mixed feelings about that. But that would be the SERVICES working group, which people interested in Anti-Abuse would not normally attend (and most probably didn't). > I was supposed to bring this topic back to the mailing list. But WHICH mailing list? This list, or the services WG list ? > Unfortunately (shame to me) I was extremally busy after meeting and > totally forgot about that. Maybe this is the right time to make this > a formal proposal and start a discussion? I would certainly say it is the right time. The important question is, which is the right place? (I'm biased: I would say it should be here!) -- Richard
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reporting Fraud
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reporting Fraud
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]