[anti-abuse-wg] Reporting Fraud

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 03:25:57PM +0000, Richard Cox wrote:
> The bottom line is that the real responsibility is at the start of the
> food chain ... the LIR that validated and submitted the original data.
> Which is why I think our first policy proposal should be that the name
> of the LIR (if any) that validated the original data, with a link to
> their contact details, must be included in the WHOIS response on every
> WHOIS lookup (port 43 or website, -b or no -b).

I was testing the waters about that during RIPE 59 Meeting (RIPE NCC
Services Working Group session). You can find my short presentation
here:
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-59/presentations/strzyzewski-inet6num-autnum.pdf
According to my memory and to the minutes from the session there were
mixed feelings about that. I was supposed to bring this topic back to
the mailing list.  Unfortunately (shame to me) I was extremally busy
after meeting and totally forgot about that. Maybe this is the right
time to make this a formal proposal and start a discussion?

Regards,
Piotr Strzyżewski

-- 
gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski
E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl