[anti-abuse-wg] Policy Proposal: Frequent Update Reminder

On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 08:57:11AM +0200, Tobias Knecht wrote:

Hi

> > Simple whois question about Polish Telecom's inetnum objects without
> > person/role references:
> > 
> > $ whois -T inetnum -r -i mnt-by TPNET |grep ^inetnum: |wc -l
> > 201157
> 
> How about keeping the proposal as it is and just change from updating
> _all_ objects to just update the direct from RIPE allocated inet(6)num
> autnums.
> 
> That way there should be at least one accurate contact for every
> ip-address in the RIPE region. If subdelegations are wrong, there will
> be still a request for correcting the data and the inet(6)num, aut-num
> will still appear on the lists, but the pressure is smaller and it would
> help.
> 
> For example if the contact of a subdelegated range is wrong the abuse
> reports could be send to the delegation above, and above and so on.
> 
> How does that sound?

Correct me if I am wrong, but this is more or less the same what RIPE
NCC is doing right now.
Allocations are maintained by RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT, organisation objects with
org-type field set to LIR are maintained by RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT. Those
objects are filled with date coming from both internal database (used
also for accounting purposes) and LIR portal. Every year LIRs are paying
their invoices, which proves that both email and snail mail addresses
provided as billing contacts are working.

Best regards,
Piotr Strzyżewski

-- 
gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski
E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl