[anti-abuse-wg] Policy Proposal: Frequent Update Reminder

Hello,

>> In message <4CA477D3.50803 at hovland.cx>, 
>> =?ISO-8859-15?Q?J=F8rgen_Hovland?= <jorgen at hovland.cx> wrote:
>>
>>> I am not going to click on 500 emails and type "yes I concur" every X
>>> months.
>>
>> I'm just an ignorant hick from the other side of the pond.  Please take
>> pity on me and enlighten me.
>>
>> You are the Responsible Party for 500 separate and different IP allocations?
>>
>> Really??
> 
> Simple whois question about Polish Telecom's inetnum objects without
> person/role references:
> 
> $ whois -T inetnum -r -i mnt-by TPNET |grep ^inetnum: |wc -l
> 201157

How about keeping the proposal as it is and just change from updating
_all_ objects to just update the direct from RIPE allocated inet(6)num
autnums.

That way there should be at least one accurate contact for every
ip-address in the RIPE region. If subdelegations are wrong, there will
be still a request for correcting the data and the inet(6)num, aut-num
will still appear on the lists, but the pressure is smaller and it would
help.

For example if the contact of a subdelegated range is wrong the abuse
reports could be send to the delegation above, and above and so on.

How does that sound?

Thanks,

Tobias










-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20101001/50380cbc/attachment.sig>