[anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)

On Wednesday 10 November 2010 16:18:36 Marco Hogewoning wrote:
> > One mandatory place for abuse contact information.
> > That is it. Nothing more, nothing less.
>
> Unless you migrate or delete data that won't be the case, you still have it
> littered all over the place.
>

You can't migrate all data on a D-day. This will happen over time and the 
proposal I think addresses this by making the attribute mandatory. 

> > Imho you and Leo Vegoda are mixing up the data quality and the work
> > quality. Data quality judges the quality and the accuracy of the data
> > given in the object and has absolutely nothing to do with the abuse work
> > done behind the email address.
>
> Again, this proposal has the risk of lowering data quality and people
> should be aware of that.
>

I am not sure I follow you. Of course we can say more on the subject in 
person, over dinner or drinks, on the coming meeting in Rome :)

Kostas