[anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)

> One mandatory place for abuse contact information.
> That is it. Nothing more, nothing less.


Unless you migrate or delete data that won't be the case, you still have it littered all over the place.

> Imho you and Leo Vegoda are mixing up the data quality and the work
> quality. Data quality judges the quality and the accuracy of the data
> given in the object and has absolutely nothing to do with the abuse work
> done behind the email address.
> 

Again, this proposal has the risk of lowering data quality and people should be aware of that.

Anyway, you and I agree that's clear and lucky this is a consensus model so I will stop here. Pointless to keep reposting the same arguments over and over...

Groet,

MarcoH
(still no hat, getting cold)